Chapter 9. The Skin
Cutaneous and Integumentary System Damage: Immune Dysregulation, Barrier Breakdown, and Toxicant-Induced Dermatitis
The skin, as both a barrier organ and active participant in immune surveillance, is one of the first sites affected bydermal exposure to environmental toxicants. This survivor’s dermatologic manifestations - including allergic dermatitis, infection susceptibility, and impaired wound healing - are consistent with the molecular and immunological injury documented in exposure literature for DEET, permethrin, and related compounds. These effects reflect both direct skin cytotoxicity and secondary immunologic collapse.
​
​
Clinical Dermatologic Presentation of the Survivor:
• Allergic contact dermatitis triggered by permethrin exposure,
presenting with erythema, pruritus, and recurring flare cycles.
• Delayed wound healing and prolonged inflammation, with
ncreased susceptibility to secondary infection at injury sites.
• Persistent skin sensitivity, especially exacerbated by UV
exposure, thermal stress, and environmental irritants.
• Frequent fungal and bacterial skin infections, particularly in
high-friction or moisture-exposed areas (e.g., feet, scalp, pelvis.
• Residual hyperpigmentation and hypopigmentation, following
inflammatory episodes and skin trauma.
• Cutaneous scarring resulting from repeated exposure-related
inflammatory responses and impaired tissue regeneration.
• Mitochondrial dysfunction in skin tissue, contributing to
reduced cellular energy, impaired repair, and chronic sensitivity
to oxidative stress.
​
​
​
Mechanistic Basis of Dermatologic Injury
1. NF-κB Hyperactivation in Keratinocytes and Dermal
Fibroblasts
• Permethrin and DEET trigger proinflammatory cytokine
cascades in the skin, leading to pruritus, erythema, and dermal
swelling.
• Chronic NF-κB activation delays resolution of inflammation,
impairing cutaneous homeostasis and repair.
​
2. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Epidermal Tissue
• Inhibits ATP production needed for keratinocyte turnover and
re-epithelialization.
• Slows healing rates and weakens skin barrier function.
​
3. eNOS Dysfunction in Dermal Capillary Beds
• Compromised nitric oxide signaling reduces vascular perfusion
to skin and subcutaneous tissues.
• Leads to ischemia, tissue hypoxia, and impaired nutrient
delivery.
​
4. Biofilm, Chemotaxis, and Microbiome Pathway
Disruption
• Impaired neutrophil migration and skin-resident immune cell
response allows opportunistic pathogens (fungal and bacterial)
to colonize wound beds.
• DEET and permethrin exposure alter the cutaneous
microbiota, contributing to eczema-like conditions, increased
transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and dysbiosis.
​
​
​
Diagnostic Blind Spots in Dermatologic Evaluation
• Delayed immune-mediated reactions are often misdiagnosed
as contact allergies unrelated to exposure.
• Wound healing failure may be dismissed as secondary
infection or aging rather than mitochondrial compromise.
• Military records often lack complete dermatological
documentation of initial permethrin reactions, resulting in
underreporting.
• Infection-prone skin is rarely correlated to systemic immune
dysregulation or microbiome injury.
​
​
​
​
Key Insights:
The survivor’s dermatologic symptoms represent an immune-compromised and metabolically weakened integumentary system directly traceable to toxicant-induced molecular injury. These are not isolated or cosmetic issues - they indicate a fundamental breakdown of skin’s barrier and immune functions. Recognition of dermal reactions as biomarkers of systemic toxic injury must inform early diagnostic screening and integrated dermatologic-immunologic care in veterans and civilians with similar exposure profiles.
​
​
​
Chapter 9 Literature Review: The Skin
​
​
Galbiati, V., Lefevre, MA., Maddalon, A. et al. Role of miR-24-3p and miR-146a-5p in dendritic cells’ maturation process induced by contact sensitizers. Arch Toxicol 97, 2183–2191 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-023-03542-z https://rdcu.be/ehn7H
This study uncovers the pivotal role of microRNAs - specifically miR-24-3p and miR-146a-5p - in the maturation and immune-activating capacity of dendritic cells exposed to chemical contact allergens. Using an in vitro model of THP-1-derived immature DCs, Galbiati and colleagues demonstrate that exposure to skin sensitizers of varying potency modulates these miRNAs in a pattern reflective of allergen strength. miR-24-3p was consistently upregulated by both strong and weak sensitizers, while miR-146a-5p expression varied inversely with allergen potency, revealing nuanced immune reprogramming at the epigenetic level. These changes translated into increased expression of antigen-presenting and costimulatory markers (e.g., CD86, HLA-DR), confirming DC maturation. In the survivor’s case, early allergic dermatitis after permethrin exposure likely initiated a similar epigenetically programmed immune response. BioSymphony’s transcriptomic analysis confirms dysregulated miRNA expression in dermal and lymphoid tissue, particularly involving pathways downstream of miR-24 and miR-146a, consistent with an ongoing cycle of antigen presentation, immune activation, and systemic inflammation initiated at the skin barrier.
​
​
​
Josh T. Arnold, Alex B. Lloyd, Stephen J. Bailey, Tomomi Fujimoto, Ryoko Matsutake, Masataka Takayanagi, Takeshi Nishiyasu, and Naoto Fujii The nitric oxide dependence of cutaneous microvascular function to independent and combined hypoxic cold exposure
Journal of Applied Physiology 2020 129:4, 947-956
This review highlights how chronic oxidative stress and toxicant exposure can disrupt nitric oxide (NO) signaling pathways, especially those governed by endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS). The authors explain that persistent inflammatory stimuli, such as those triggered by environmental toxicants like DEET and permethrin, can lead to eNOS uncoupling - a state in which NO production is impaired while harmful reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation is increased. These redox imbalances drive capillary hypoperfusion, microvascular inflammation, and ischemia, especially in high-turnover tissues like the skin. In the survivor’s case, this framework explains his impaired dermal healing, necrotic pigmentation, and microangiopathic changes confirmed by skin imaging. BioSymphony’s vascular omics profiling reveals angiogenic pathway suppression and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) dysregulation consistent with eNOS-driven perfusion failure across dermal and systemic compartments.
​
​
​
Qian J, Fulton D. "Post-translational regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in vascular endothelium." Front Physiol. 2013 Dec 13;4:347. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00347. PMID: 24379783; PMCID: PMC3861784.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3861784/
Qian and Fulton explore how endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) is intricately controlled through post-translational mechanisms such as phosphorylation, acetylation, and S-nitrosylation. These modifications impact eNOS activity, subcellular localization, and interaction with regulatory proteins like calmodulin and caveolin-1. Disruption of these control mechanisms - particularly in oxidative environments - leads to eNOS uncoupling and diminished nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, promoting vascular inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. The survivor’s impaired wound healing, dermal ischemia, and vascular stress signatures align with this framework. BioSymphony’s endothelial transcriptome analysis reveals suppressed phosphorylation sites and abnormal redox signaling within dermal capillary networks, consistent with disrupted eNOS post-translational regulation.
​
​
Förstermann U, Sessa WC. "Nitric oxide synthases: regulation and function." Eur Heart J. 2012 Apr;33(7):829-37, 837a-837d. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr304. Epub 2011 Sep 1. PMID: 21890489; PMCID: PMC3345541.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3345541/
Förstermann and Sessa provide a broad overview of nitric oxide synthase isoforms and their roles in cardiovascular physiology. They emphasize that eNOS is essential not only for vasodilation and blood pressure regulation but also for limiting inflammation, oxidative stress, and vascular permeability. The authors describe how environmental stressors - including pollutants and xenobiotics - can reduce eNOS expression and activity through transcriptional suppression and increased asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous eNOS inhibitor. These mechanisms mirror the survivor’s presentation of dermal vascular instability, microangiopathic pigment changes, and inflammatory flares. BioSymphony’s vascular health module identifies suppressed eNOS gene expression and elevated ADMA-related signatures in dermal and subcutaneous tissues.
​
​
​
Searles, Charles et. al., (2005). "Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression."
https://journals.physiology.org/doi/epdf/10.1152/ajpcell.00457.2005
​
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology 2006 291:5, C803-C816
​
Searles examines the layers of control over eNOS expression, including transcriptional regulation by shear stress and cytokines, as well as post-transcriptional control via microRNAs (e.g., miR-21, miR-155) and mRNA stability factors. He notes that toxicants can reduce eNOS mRNA stability and inhibit translation through oxidative stress pathways. These findings support the observed microvascular degradation in the survivor’s dermis and his symptoms of poor circulation and cold hypersensitivity. BioSymphony identifies post-transcriptional silencing signals and abnormal miRNA activity across endothelial compartments, matching the patterns of toxicant-induced transcriptional repression described in this study.
​
​
​
Verma G, Sharma NL, Shanker V, Mahajan VK, Tegta GR. "Pesticide contact dermatitis in fruit and vegetable farmers of Himachal Pradesh (India)." Contact Dermatitis. 2007 Nov;57(5):316-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01229.x. PMID: 17937746.
This clinical study identified pesticide-related allergic contact dermatitis in a cohort of Indian agricultural workers routinely exposed to dermal pesticide applications. Patch testing revealed sensitization to commonly used pesticides such as captan, propargite, and chlorpyrifos, with symptoms including facial and extremity dermatitis, seasonal exacerbation, and relapsing inflammation. The parallels with the survivor’s clinical history - particularly across abdomen, pelvis, genitalia and buttocks - dermatitis following permethrin exposure and chronic inflammation at sites of friction - are striking. While the survivor was not patch-tested at the time of his exposure, subsequent immune and dermatologic assessments revealed persistent hypersensitivity and chronic barrier dysfunction. BioSymphony identifies overlapping signatures of contact sensitizer response, including cytokine overexpression and T-cell activation pathways, offering molecular support for systemic immune memory initiated by early skin sensitization to pesticides.
​
​
​
Lisi, Paolo. “Sensitization Risk of Pyrethroid Insecticides.” Contact Dermatitis 26, no. 5 (1992): 349–350.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb00133.x
Lisi’s study highlights the potential for synthetic pyrethroids, such as permethrin, to act as sensitizers, leading to allergic contact dermatitis. The research underscores that even compounds considered to have low toxicity can elicit hypersensitivity reactions upon dermal exposure. In the survivor’s case, the onset of skin inflammation and hypersensitivity following permethrin exposure aligns with these findings. BioSymphony’s analysis reveals immune activation markers and cytokine profiles consistent with a sensitization response, supporting the relevance of Lisi’s observations to the survivor’s condition.
​
Chapter 9. Summary Insight
The Skin – Cutaneous and Integumentary System Damage
The survivor’s dermatologic history reflects a systemic breakdown of the skin’s dual function: as both a physical barrier and immunological interface. What began as localized allergic contact dermatitis progressed into a chronically inflamed, metabolically compromised cutaneous state. These are not superficial or cosmetic issues - they are biomarkers of deep systemic injury and immune dysregulation triggered by environmental toxicants.
The molecular underpinnings of this cutaneous dysfunction are now well-documented. Chronic exposure to permethrin and DEET activates NF-κB signaling in keratinocytes and fibroblasts, sustaining inflammatory cytokine release and impairing normal wound resolution. Simultaneously, mitochondrial dysfunction within the epidermis leads to impaired cellular turnover, diminished ATP production, and increased vulnerability to oxidative stress.
Reduced eNOS activity and microvascular instability further disrupt dermal perfusion, contributing to poor tissue oxygenation and healing delays. Opportunistic bacterial and fungal infections - once viewed as secondary or incidental - are now understood to be the result of impaired neutrophil chemotaxis, immune suppression, and cutaneous microbiome disruption.
These injuries are not isolated. They mirror the survivor’s system-wide dysfunctions in vascular, immune, endocrine, and gastrointestinal tissues - unified by mitochondrial collapse and persistent inflammatory signaling. The skin, as the first line of defense and a neuroimmune organ, shows the earliest and most visible signs of toxicant injury. It must be treated as such.
BioSymphony’s diagnostic model reframes dermatologic symptoms as early-warning signals of systemic toxic injury. This chapter’s findings strongly support the need for integrated dermatologic and immunologic screening in veterans and civilians exposed to environmental toxicants. Early identification of barrier disruption, inflammatory signatures, and mitochondrial stress could prevent multi-system progression and improve long-term outcomes.
